Have Faith In Science – Which Means GMOs [Opinion]

david eddyThis whole brouhaha over whether to vaccinate children for measles frankly caught me off guard. Not so much that there were people who were opposed to vaccines, as it’s a question of trust. Those on the far left have total unbending trust in what is “natural,” and those on the far right have total unbending mistrust in “institutions.”

I just thought most people would realize that people used to actually die from measles. Since we started vaccinating kids, they don’t even get them. Ergo, vaccines must be a good thing.

But that would be trusting science, and a lot of Americans have no such trust. There was a really interesting poll released recently by the Pew Research Center and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. It was interesting not only because it revealed how much Americans trust science, but the gap between how much they trust science and how much scientists trust science.

For example, when asked if vaccinations should be required for children, just 68% agreed, while 86% of the scientists did. That might be on the low side even for the scientists, but I’d guess about 10% of people are opposed to mandatory anything. I can see that, even if I don’t agree with it, as the United States of America connotes a certain personal freedom.

What really shocked me about the survey were the responses to questions regarding agriculture. One answer was particularly scary: Only about one in four Americans, or 28%, said that it was safe to eat foods grown with pesticides.

Top Articles
A New Biopesticide in the Making To Fight Spotted Wing Drosophila

Just 68% of the scientists did, which is unfortunately on the low side, but it’s a solid 40% more favorable than the general population. Any way you slice it, we have a lot of educating to do.

The responses to one other question regarding agriculture were similarly disappointing. When asked if it was safe to eat genetically modified foods, those that contain genetically modified organisms, commonly known as GMOs, just over one in three people, 37%, said it was. This despite the fact that most Americans eat GMO corn and soybeans every day, and have for years, with no documented health problems.

The responses from the scientists were understandably far more favorable, with 88% saying that consuming GMOs were safe. That’s probably about as high a response as you’ll see, because it doesn’t seem like more than 90% of people agree on hardly anything.

I bring this up in part because I was talking to some tree and vine nursery industry folks at a recent conference, and they agreed that it was vital that people be educated on GMOs. Specifically, they need to be educated about how GMOs are just a different way of achieving the same goals we’ve had with our food supply for many years.

“Nature,” as many people understand it, went out the window in plant breeding many years ago. Have you ever seen a “natural” tomato? It looks like just a puny berry. It’s not even red, much less a purple so-called “natural heirloom,” so prized by foodies who disdain “artificial” breeding.

What’s it going to take to convince people that in a world of global trade where invasive pests roam free, causing havoc, that we need to bring plant science up to speed? Do we have to actually lose our citrus industry? It’s up to you and me and everyone who cares about the produce business to educate people about the benefits of modern scientific methods.

0

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Matt Matt says:

Hi David,

I am glad that this is an opinion piece, because it is one that I do not share. I don’t believe that GMOs are necessarily safe nor are they necessary. That is a political opinion that is pushed by many who favor GMOs. Europe does not seem to be suffering from a lack of GMOs even though their crops are are almost all conventional. Their farmers don’t seem to be suffering either. They have innovated with new cultivation tools and methods. They have very strict guidelines on pesticide residues and their governments actually test produce for compliance.

Consumers don’t trust our government and much of our industry because it is not based on trust, but on power and money. That means that those that have the most power and money set the rules and those rules are not always for the benefit of those without power and money.

Take GMO labeling for example. This is largely desired by the public, yet vigorously fought by industry. Monsanto (Who people associate with DDT, Agent Orange, Lies and deception) is what comes to mind with GMOs. I don’t think that will every change.

As to measles outbreaks and vaccination. First, most of those who have come down with measles recently have already been vaccinated. To most of the educated populace this means that the measles vaccine does NOT work. Second, measles was virtually eliminated over the last 50 years. Why? Very good sanitation, lack of infected people flowing into the country, etc. We also don’t know WHICH VERSION of the measles people are contracting. There are several labs who still actively work with the disease. This may be a lab release (For which a vaccine would be ineffective) and not an in the wild infection.

Look at the most recent ebola outbreak. There is no vaccine and usually no cure. Why did infections spontaneously start to go down? Could it be due to an effort to increase public education on how it spreads, better sanitation, better controls on food and healthy practices by the people living in the endemic area?

A knee jerk reaction is to draw a conclusion about an outcome without a direct cause and effect. Many of the most dangerous pathogens in history that have caused massive suffering were not stopped by vaccines, but by better education. The plague that killed 1/3 of Europe’s population was not stopped by a vaccine, but rather by better knowledge of the populace on how the disease spread and better sanitation.

When there is a profit motive behind vaccinations/GMOs/any modern invention, people tend to trust independent sources for testing and validation that the product is safe and it works. When the industry feels it needs to control political power, the courts and use fear to sell their products then it should only be natural that people will not so willingly believe what that industry is selling.

Avatar for a20havoc a20havoc says:

Hey Matt–got any sources for the claims you’re making? That aren’t from Mike Adams or Joe Mercola? Or GM Watch? Where’s the evidence that Monsanto bought off the voters in Oregon? I find it hard to believe that you and your ilk wouldn’t cite it if it really exists. Just go away already. You add nothing to the discussion.