Are More Organic Labels Needed?

If you sell to grocery or box stores, it’s not easy getting a message through to consumers. Organic labels are arguably the only exception.

Customers put a lot of trust in the USDA Organic Seal. They believe buying an organic head of lettuce allows them to improve the environment in a small way. And growers largely agree the label has heft. It’s not a hollow promise.

That said, there’s a lively debate among growers about how to improve organic labeling.

One option is add-on labeling. Some growers turn to programs like Real Organic and Regenerative Organic Certified because they feel the current national program does not go far enough. Both programs aim to bolster what’s lacking in national organic standards, including standards for soil health and labor protections.

Real Organic has a “To the barricades!” rebellious tone. It makes the case that current national standards are too permissive and favor large farms over smaller farms. Regenerative’s website avoids the rabble rousing and gets straight to its standards — building soil organic matter, no hydroponics, promoting biodiversity, and so on.

Top Articles
Researchers on Path To Make Apple Blossom Thinning Easier

The idea of a purer standard has appeal. I’m just not convinced these more stringent certifications are practical. Mind you, the actual standards themselves have weight. What I lack confidence in is those labels meaning anything to the public at large.

There are a couple reasons for my doubt:

Too many similar labels. It’s easy to lose sight of how customers and the public see things when you are embedded in the organic farm world. For your perspective, you can clearly see how important different production methods can be. But, outside a small group of passionate followers, most outsiders just want to hear something is organic.

What is the “most pure” label? These certifications signal to customers and the public what your farm stands for. But which one is best? You see this type of thing happen all the time in politics and religion. The main group drifts a little too far from its standards, and the fundamentalists break away. The overall movement is often weakened, although not always.

To me, the best approach is to take on the national organic certification if it improves the business side of your business.

If your particular customer base would respond positively to the add-on certifications, then sign up for those as well.

If you are a true organic grower, none of these certifications alters how much you protect your soil and your workers. You believe in sustainable agriculture, and that won’t change.


Oh, One More Thing

Our 2021 State of the Vegetable Industry survey picked up on this need to balance the ideal and the practical. We asked a simple question: Why do you grow organic crops?

Sustainability and market demand statically tied as the No. 1 reason.

Why Do You Grow Organic Crops?

26% Sustainability is important to me

25% Market demand

19% It’s the best production method

10% Organic crop prices

10% To diversity my offerings

Organic Growers: What Percentage of Your Operation is Organic?

% of Operation

19% Less than 10% of operation

10% 10% to 25%

7% 25% to 50%

22% 50% to 90%

43% 100%

Adds to 101% due to rounding to whole numbers.

2

Leave a Reply

Avatar for Dave Chapman Dave Chapman says:

Hi Carol. I would say say that Real Organic is speaking to people rather than “rabble raising.” Much of what is important in the organic movement is being lost by the USDA. This is simply an effort to inform people and offer an alternative. I agree that a farmer can be organic without any certification at all. Certification was created to help farmers and eaters who care to connect. When it loses integrity or transparency, then it is failing all of us. Hopefully people will become more curious and investigate as they learn more. Real Organic is not a battle about scale. It is a battle about honesty in the marketplace. Real Organic is approaching 1000 certified farms. This is happening.

You said: “If you are a true organic grower, none of these certifications alters how much you protect your soil and your workers. You believe in sustainable agriculture, and that won’t change.” I am wondering what you are referring to as a “true organic grower?” Is it a grower who conforms to the original NOP standards of growing in soil and maintaining the health of the soil using regenerative practices? If that is the case, then it seems you might be missing the point about why a “Real Organic Project” label is desperately important. If organic growers are producing their products using aero- or hydro- methods, then they DO NOT qualify for the add-on Real Organic Project label. Consumers need to become accustomed to “how” the products they buy were grown. Right now, it is near impossible to know when a USDA certified organic product was grown in coconut coir or some other soil-less medium, in a greenhouse using a vertical water-pumping system, in a basement using artificial lighting or any other soil-less technique. If the product has the Real Organic Project label on it, none of these other growing methods was used to produce the final product. That is why the add-on label is so important. This is not about confusing the consumer at all. Instead, the Real Organic Project label is assuring them that what they are buying was grown according to the original NOP standards….and that means in soil. In the absence of this add-on label, it is anyone’s guess the extent to which the product meets the organic standards originally developed.

Avatar for Virginia Johnson Virginia Johnson says:

To the Author, Carol M. You have not gone into the issue of the dilution of the USDA Organic Label by people who are more money motivated than true to the original purpose of the National Organic Program, which was to sustain and improve the SOIL, which gives us living foods. The original organic label was hijacked by the hydroponics industry and CAFO producers and others that are just looking for the financial boost to be had by waving the Organic banner. These Johnny come lately types sicken me, as one who with other like minded producers worked hard to get the organic certification program up and growing decades ago, with the legislation to bring about the organic label. Hydro people for example, saw how good the organic program was doing and decided to find a way, supported by big money to buy their way in to the current NOP, rather than developing their own label. SICK, and I don’t believe they will be the winning and REAL ORGANIC Program in the final analysis. I have faith that consumers WILL indeed be able to see the truth of Real ORGANIC -VS- a stolen label.